Archive for research

ArcelorMittal abuses in South Africa

The European Coalition for Corporate Justice has published two case studies which claimed that  European companies are not respecting environmental and human rights standards  when operating in countries outside the EU.

The first case study, entitled “Failure to communicate”, focuses on the operations of steel conglomerate Arcelor Mittal in South Africa and on the claims of environmental pollution and degradation of labour rights.

An important point made in the report is that the South African authorities knew very well Arcelor Mittal’s record of serious environmental pollution.

According to the report:

According to the report, Arcelor Mittal and the South African government are withholding information which could enable the interested parties to assess the company’s impact on environment and if the company’s plan to act against pollution is effective.
Following public campaigns in the 1990’s, Arcelor Mittal has adopted an environment management plan but the government has agreed that the plan would not be made public. Moreover,  the government “will not allow full public disclosure of the information it contains, including the level of
pollution caused by ArcelorMittal.”
The lack of information affects not only the public at large but also the public authorities. For example, the “waste site public monitoring committee” cannot assess the impacts of the Arcelor Mittal waste site on society and the
environment.
The attempts to determine Arcelor Mittal to change its policy have failed and the multinational stated in a letter that it “will not be in the best interest
of ArcelorMittal South Africa” to disclose the requested information.

Leave a comment »

Corporate Social Responsibility and Regulatory Governance:Toward Inclusive Government?

This book, edited by Peter Utting from UNRISD and José Carlos Marques, “assesses the global rise of private regulation and CSR from the perspective of social and sustainable development. By adopting a multidisciplinary lens, it examines why the experience of CSR pales in comparison with the promise, what needs to be done to address ‘the intellectual crisis’ of CSR, and forms of corporate accountability and regulation more conducive to inclusive patterns of development.

Table of Contents:

Introduction: The Intellectual Crisis of CSR; P.Utting & J.C.Marques
CSR and Changing Modes of Governance: Towards Corporate Noblesse Oblige?; C.Crouch
Wal-Martization and CSR-ization in Developing Countries; N-L.Sum
Corporate Social Responsibility in a Neoliberal Age; P.Ireland & R.G.Pillay
Linking Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Policy in Zambia; N.Noyoo
Business, Corporate Responsibility and Poverty Reduction; M.Blowfield
Transnational Corporations and Poverty Reduction: Strategic and Regional Variations; R.van Tulder
Cross-sector Partnership as an Approach to Inclusive Development; R.Findlay-Brooks, W.Visser & T.Wright
Growing Sustainable Business in East Africa: The Potential and Limits of Partnerships for Development; C.Gregoratti
Private Food Governance: Implications for Social Sustainability and Democratic Legitimacy; D.Fuchs & A.Kalfagianni
Spaces of Contestation: The Governance of Industry’s Environmental Performance in Durban, South Africa; J.Van Alstine
Challenging Governance in Global Commodity Chains: The Case of Transnational Activist Campaigns for Better Work Conditions; F.Palpacuer

Leave a comment »

Business Adaptation to Climate Change

Blog Action Day is the right moment to share the findings of recent research on climate change!

The Network for Business Sustainability has looked at over 200 studies since 1997 on climate change adaptation.The research project’s findings are structured in four reports: concepts&theories, current practices, case studies and tools, knowledge gaps&future research and I will present some of the most important research findings and their implications for managers.

• As there is no agreed definition of business adaptation to climate change and theories on adaptation are still underdeveloped, the research study emphasizes the need to develop shared definitions which should be the result of a collaborative effort between firms, academia, government and NGO’s. The adaptation discussion should also become mainstream within the firm, the sector, and in multi-sectoral platforms.

• Business adaptation to climate change differs across sectors in terms of risks, opportunities, strategies and tools. Several sectors are leaders in adaptation to climate change: the insurance sector is a leader in risk assessment, the agriculture and tourism sector are leaders in their awareness of climate impact. Consequently, the Network for Business Sustainability advises managers, especially from leading organizations to collaborate within/across sectors in order to share knowledge and develop solutions.

• Unfortunately,  the third report clearly states that :”In general, business is taking a ‘wait-and-see’ approach, with adapters being the exception rather than the rule.” but the researchers warn that such an approach comes with great risks.

• Existing tools deal mostly with risk management (risk frameworks, scenario tools, decision trees, costing tools, computer simulation tools) but there is a need to develop tools for risk modelling and opportunity assessment. Moreover, there is a need to undertake real adaptation measures and strategies beyond short-term measurements and GHG (Green House Gas) mitigation.

More about climate change:

COP15 , the United Nations Climate Change Conference,December 2009.

Interview with the Danish Minister, Connie Hedegaard

What can you do?(the European Union’s website on climate action)

Leave a comment »

Books on CSR

1.Professionals´ Perspectives of Corporate Social Responsibility edited by Idowu, Samuel O. and Leal Filho, Walter, Springer.

Due: September 17, 2009

2.“Corporate Social Responsibility In Europe.Rhetoric and Realities.” Edited by Regine Barth and Franziska Wolff from the Environmental Law and Governance Division, Öko-Institut, Germany, Edward Elgar, 2009.

Leave a comment »

Globe Award Nominees for Sustainability Research.

The Globe Forum has published the Nominees for the 2009 Globe Award for Sustainability Research. Globe Award’s Sustainability Research Award is given to original research which successfully contributes to increased knowledge on sustainability.

The 2009 Nominees are:

1.Bengt Sture Ershag, Scandinavian Enviro Systems AB for an Innovation called Carbonizing by Forced Convection, a technology that thermally breaks down any organic material in a controllable environmental friendly closed system.

2. Dr. Candice Stevens, Sustainable Development Advisor at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for research focusing on “governance practices for sustainable development, identifying good practices in National Sustainable Development Strategies and approaches for Institutionalising Sustainable Development.”

3.Lisbeth Segerlund, Stockholm University, Dept. of Economic History, Section of International Relations for research focusing on the development of corporate social responsibility understood as a new international norm and how this norm has become an issue on the international agenda.”

4. Nimbkar Agricultural Research Institute (NARI) for developing a light source which runs on locally produced fuel, is environmentally friendly and produces bright light equivalent to that from a 100 W electric bulb.

5. PhD Susanne Arvidsson, School of Economics and Management, Lund for a research project  focusing on “how companies work with Environmental, Social and Ethical responsibility and corporate Governance issues, how they communicate their achievements to stakeholders and how these issues can be worked more efficiently on.”

The Nominees for the Sustainability Innovation Award and Sustainability Reporting Award can be found here.

Leave a comment »

Grants for CSR research

1. EASY ECO  Conference 2009

“Stakeholder Perspectives in Evaluating Sustainable Development”, Budapest, 16-18 October, 2009.

EU-Grants are available for young researchers (with less than ten years research experience) to cover all costs (travel expenses, participation fees, accommodation and living allowance).The presentation of a paper increases the chance of getting a grant, however, it is not mandatory.

The current Call for Papers, together with the application for EU-Grants, will be open until 15 May 2009. Details on the application process can be found at http://www.sustainability.eu/easy/?k=apply.

Submission deadline: 15 May 2009.

2. 4th. CORE Conference 2009

“The potential of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to support the integration of core EU strategies”, 15-16 June 2009, Berlin.

Grants are still available for papers addressing issues covered under theme-tracks 1-3 as described in the Call for Papers.  Abstracts addressing theme track 3 will receive preferential treatment.

Submission deadline: 18 May 2009.
For more details  refer to the call for papers at http://www.core-conferences.net/attach/CORE_Call-for-Papers_2009.pdf or visit CORE’s website at: http://www.core-conferences.net/

3. EABIS Colloquium 2009

“The Role and Purpose of Business in Society: Challenges and Issues for Global and Corporate Governance”, Barcelona, 21-22 September 2009.

For more details refer to the Call of Papers.

Submission deadline: 29 May 2009.

Comments (2) »

Global Practices of CSR-book review

“Global Practices on Corporate Social Responsibility”, Idowu, Samuel O.; Leal Filho, Walter (Eds.), 2009, XXIV, 508 p. 13 illus., Hardcover, ISBN: 978-3-540-68812-9

“Global practices of Corporate Social Responsibility” is the first book in a series coordinated by Samuel Idowu, senior lecturer at the London Metropolitan University, and dr.Walter Leal Filho, head of the Research and Transfer Centre “Application of Life Sciences” at the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences.

The aim of the book is “to codify in one single document international evidence of CSR actions of corporate entities which are already practising or in the process of formalizing their practices in different countries.” As the issue of CSR is a topical one in every country, the book focuses on national institutional arrangements and practices which are studied according to different methodologies.In the 21 chapters the authors provide evidence  about the various aspects of the  relationship between the national context and CSR. The 19 participating countries in the project have been divided in five parts: Europe, East Asia, Middle East and Africa, Americas, Australasia.

Some of the  questions addressed by the authors are : Which issues fall under the umbrella of CSR in each of these countries and why?  The chapter on South Africa shows how the historical context (colonialism and apartheid) determined a certain evolution of the concept of CSR which was further shaped by the regulatory framework like the Mine Health and Safety Act 1986 and the National Environmental Management Act 1998.

Other questions raised and answered are: Who are the players in the field of CSR in each country? Which are the drivers for CSR? How are the companies practicing CSR?Which is the relationship between the regulatory framework and CSR?

The national dimension of the CSR concept is obvious in the case of drivers. A  culture based on trust,intolerance to corruption, an emphasis on good corporate governance and a pro-globalization attitude are the main drivers for CSR in Finland while in Russia, some  CSR initiatives are an attempt to avoid mandatory norms.

How are companies practicing CSR? Several authors  include in their articles results of the research undertaken on topics like: awareness of the csr concept by the managers (Nigeria), involvement in csr practices (U.S., Belgium), mode of csr reporting (Russia, U.S.) or of framing a csr policy(Sweden).

Several chapters like those on Sweden or Belgium present the governmental initiatives designed to create an enabling environment for CSR. The chapter on Russia offers evidence on the relationship between the regulatory framework and CSR. The russian study links the poor quality of voluntary disclosure to the lack of mandatory disclosure and the weakness of NGO’s and other forms of pressure making again clear the relationship between the national dimension and CSR.

The authors managed to provide a clear and detailed picture of the national dimension of CSR and it is interesting to analyse the results from a comparative perspective. The main strength of the book is its diversity reflected in the number of countries selected and the methodologies used to study CSR in context. It makes a good case for including the local complexities in the existing ranking assessments.It is written in an accesible style therefore it is suitable not only for specialists but also for wider audiences.

Leave a comment »

CSR-pedia

CSR-pedia is a  website that categorizes, catalogs, and describes corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs developed by companies to help solve social and environmental problems around the world.

The two main features of this website are a CSR Program Directory, and a Socially Responsible Business List.

In the CSR Program Directory, each socially responsible and/or environmentally sustainable activity is categorized by:

The Socially Responsible Business List consists of international companies that engage in major socially responsible acticities.  Companies are currently being selected based on prevalence in CSR literature.

CSR-pedia was created by a team of researchers under the supervision of  Dr.Mary-Ann Ferguson from the Department of Public Relations, University of Florida.

Leave a comment »

Why are we moral?

Broader issues today:)

Jonathan Haidt studies how and why we evolved to be moral in a cultural context. He hopes that by understanding more about our moral roots “we can learn to be civil and understanding of those whose morals don’t match ours, but who are equally good and moral people on their own terms.”

More about it in his TED conference posted in September 2008. About 18 minutes but it is quite captivating. Enjoy:)

more about “Vodpod Firefox Extension for WordPress“, posted with vodpod

Leave a comment »

Reputation matters:))

The Reputation Institute has been measuring corporate reputations since 1999.

Corporate reputations are valuable assets because they influence the profitability of companies. Consumers, creditors or job-seekers decide whether to enter into a relationship with a company on the basis of its reputation among other factors.

In 2006, Reputation Institute has introduced RepTrak Model, a scorecard for measuring corporate reputations internationally. At the heart of this model is Pulse which measures the degree to which people trust, respect, admire and have a good feeling about a company. Scores are based on answers to four questions and are standardized on a scale of 0-100.

The Reputation Institute further examines if the Pulse score is based on perceptions of companies on seven underlying dimensions identified in the RepTrak Model: Products/Services, Innovation, WorkPlace, Citizenship, Governance, Leadership, Performance. It is important for companies to understand what is important for their stakeholders and to act accordingly.

In 2008, The Reputation Institute published the a special report for the Boston College for Corporate Citizenship in which it has included the list  of the most respected U.S. Companies by the public.

Google earned the highest rating of perceptions along social dimensions (Citizenship, Governance and Workplace). Basically, with the exception of Berkshire Hathaway, consumer oriented companies made up the majority of top 20 SRI performers.

The main conclusion is that companies who have invested in a strong Social Responsibility profile get a much higher level of support than other companies.

65,7% of the US general public would recommend the Top 20 socially responsible companies to others compared to only 25,9%  recommendations for the bottom 20 companies. And more than 27% would not recommend the companies that are not seen as social responsible.

The conclusion of the report is that social responsibility is a direct way to business success.

But “having a strong social responsibility profile “= “being socially responsible”?


Comments (1) »